Binary message encoding typically yields smaller message sizes compared to text for a single message and progressively even smaller message sizes over the duration of a communication session. Unlike text encoding, binary encoding does not have to use special handling for binary data, such as using Base64, but represents bytes as bytes.
If your solution does not require interoperability, but you still want to use HTTP transport, you can compose the BinaryMessageEncodingBindingElement into a custom binding that uses the HttpTransportBindingElement class for the transport.
If a number of clients on your service require interoperability, it is recommended that you expose parallel endpoints that each has the appropriate transport and encoding choices for the respective clients enabled. As mentioned earlier, the decision to use MTOM encoding depends on the data volume you are sending. Also, the service contracts designed for use with MTOM-enabled endpoints should, when possible, be constrained to specifying such data transfer operations. Related control functionality should reside on a separate contract.
Note that it may not be possible to observe this rule in all cases, such as when session support is required. Regardless of which of the three built-in encoders you use in your application, the programming experience is identical with regards to transferring binary data. The difference is in how WCF handles the data based on their data types. If the threshold is not exceeded, the data is encoded as Base The string and all other types that are not binary is always represented as a string inside the message body, regardless of size.
The effect on the MTOM encoding is the same whether you use an explicit data contract, as shown in the preceding example, use a parameter list in an operation, have nested data contracts, or transfer a data contract object inside a collection.
Byte arrays are always candidates for optimization and are optimized if the optimization thresholds are being met. You should not be using System. Stream derived types inside of data contracts. Stream data should be communicated using the streaming model, explained in the following "Streaming Data" section.
When you have a large amount of data to transfer, the streaming transfer mode in WCF is a feasible alternative to the default behavior of buffering and processing messages in memory in their entirety. As mentioned earlier, enable streaming only for large messages with text or binary content if the data cannot be segmented, if the message must be delivered in a timely fashion, or if the data is not yet fully available when the transfer is initiated.
Digital signatures for the message body cannot be performed because they require computing a hash over the entire message contents.
With streaming, the content is not fully available when the message headers are constructed and sent and, therefore, a digital signature cannot be computed. Encryption depends on digital signatures to verify that the data has been reconstructed correctly. Reliable sessions must buffer sent messages on the client for redelivery if a message gets lost in transfer and must hold messages on the service before handing them to the service implementation to preserve message order in case messages are received out-of-sequence.
Because of these functional constraints, you can use only transport-level security options for streaming and you cannot turn on reliable sessions.
Streaming is only available with the following system-defined bindings:. Because the underlying transports of NetTcpBinding and NetNamedPipeBinding have inherent reliable delivery and connection-based session support, unlike HTTP, these two bindings are only minimally affected by these constraints, in practice.
The Message Queuing transport only supports buffered data transfers with a constrained message size, while all other transports do not have any practical message size limit for the vast majority of scenarios. Streaming is also not available when using the Peer Channel transport, so is not available with the NetPeerTcpBinding. You may get unexpected behavior when streaming calls with a session-based binding. All streaming calls are made through a single channel the datagram channel that does not support sessions even if the binding being used is configured to use sessions.
If multiple clients make streaming calls to the same service object over a session-based binding and the service object's concurrency mode is set to single and its instance context mode is set to PerSession, all calls must go through the datagram channel and so only one call is processed at a time.
One or more clients may then time out. MaxConcurrentSessions has no effect in this case because there is only one "session" available. Send and accept requests in streaming mode, and accept and return responses in buffered mode StreamedRequest. Send and accept requests in buffered mode, and accept and return responses in streamed mode StreamedResponse. This method generates a bitmap and then save it to a MemoryStream in. The operation then returns that stream to the caller.
Notice the second to last line of code: WebOperationContext. Although this sample shows how to return a. The operation must retrieve or generate the data and then write it to a stream.
Create a ServiceHost instance for the service specifying the service class and the base address. Although : big sizes on slow communication channels require you change timeout values too. Illeris, thank you for your comment. As I found the solution for my problem without an answer from other people, I replied only if someone had the same problem to try to guide them, as it worked for me. Yes, I forgot to add the code, and added it now. As for the buffer limit of the 64Kb, there are some limitations on the server side that I'm aware sort of.
The content you requested has been removed. Ask a question. Quick access. Search related threads. Remove From My Forums. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.
Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog. Stack Gives Back Safety in numbers: crowdsourcing data on nefarious IP addresses. Featured on Meta. New post summary designs on greatest hits now, everywhere else eventually.
0コメント